Just a quick note that the report is at the printers. When it becomes publically available, we'll post on the blog.
We can't wait to share what we have found.
Friday, 16 October 2015
Wednesday, 12 August 2015
Reflections: Nirmala Arunasalam
There is a proverb that
states, “When you travel, you learn things about the people and places you see”
(Anon). Participating in the Poland
study tour allowed me to “move out of my comfort zone” to network and expand my
learning and understanding of the Polish public and private Higher Education
system.
During the week, we met many senior representatives both in the
public and private universities who were very welcoming. They engaged in conversation
about their Higher education systems, which are different from the UK’s. Within
the UK, although universities charge tuition fees, they are ‘state-funded’ and
are responsible for employing their own staff; there are a very small number of
private universities. Similar to the UK
experience in the early 1990s to meet the higher education demand, polytechnics
were amalgamated with or became fully fledged universities. Similarly, in Poland it led to the introduction of many private
universities, with a great deal of competition between universities to attract
students.
Most UK universities are
becoming more business focused whilst the private universities in Poland have
been and continue to be very competitive, business focused and offer higher
quality services compared to their public
universities. The number of international
students in the UK is high despite
the restrictions on student visa entry but the number in Poland is small.
A few aspects put a
smile on my face, firstly, students worked full-time during the week and opted
to study at weekends, secondly, Polish universities do not operate a system of
external examiners similar to UK to
ensure university assessment guidelines are adhered in the marking and
moderation process and finally, plagiarism
is seen as a criminal offence!
The study tour was an
informative and insightful experience as the people we met were welcoming,
willing to share information and I saw some scenic landscapes and extraordinary
historical sites.
Sunday, 12 July 2015
Reflections: Andrew Tuson
I have learnt that travel changes you in ways you do not expect and my recent experiences with the Study Tour confirms this.
The most important point the trip pushed home for me is this: you have to consider an HE system from its own internal point of reference, and not the Anglo-American axis. This for me makes external reports that try (even implicitly) to impose a norm rather problematics. A better way is to uncover the assumptions and dynamics, and then see how well and robuitly the system compares against that and any external pressures it may face.
One may even wish to be radical and ask what the students get out of it. Burton-Clark's triangle of coordination sprung to mind a number of times during the visit.
As the coordinator I had the pleasure of making a lot of contacts along the way. I am of course indebted to Paul Temple and Mike Shattock, who I had the pleasure of being taught by on the IoE's HE MBA. They put me in touch with another MBA alumus from a private Polish HEI. They also pointed me to Poland's foremost HE management scholar. You will hear much about his work in the report. These contacts were invaluable.
As far as observations about what I oberved on the tour, much of it is along the lines of what the others have said. The fact that academic misconduct is covered by the Polish Penal Code did raise raise a smile. But I would like to make two of my own.
First, given the large private sector I would have expected entry by private equity firms such as in the US but this was not the case. The clue would be seem to in the fee levels chared (c.a. 2,500 pounds against 18,000 pounds for a three-year bachelors), even accounting for the much lower wages in Poland, I would find it hard to see how the large margins they typically seek would be acheiveable.
Second, the Polish I think have adapted as well as could be expected given their historical trajectory; but on their own terms. Some of the practices we have seen, compare well with good practices in the UK.
In fact after the Study Tour, I spent three more weeks backpacking round it (until I fell ill). I like the place and given the opportunity might be persuaded to stay there a while (Polish HEIs - hint, hint!).
There is a good story to be told about Polish HE and I hope we as a team will be able to do it justice.
Anyway, now to write the report. I hope to get it out of the door for November.
The most important point the trip pushed home for me is this: you have to consider an HE system from its own internal point of reference, and not the Anglo-American axis. This for me makes external reports that try (even implicitly) to impose a norm rather problematics. A better way is to uncover the assumptions and dynamics, and then see how well and robuitly the system compares against that and any external pressures it may face.
One may even wish to be radical and ask what the students get out of it. Burton-Clark's triangle of coordination sprung to mind a number of times during the visit.
As the coordinator I had the pleasure of making a lot of contacts along the way. I am of course indebted to Paul Temple and Mike Shattock, who I had the pleasure of being taught by on the IoE's HE MBA. They put me in touch with another MBA alumus from a private Polish HEI. They also pointed me to Poland's foremost HE management scholar. You will hear much about his work in the report. These contacts were invaluable.
As far as observations about what I oberved on the tour, much of it is along the lines of what the others have said. The fact that academic misconduct is covered by the Polish Penal Code did raise raise a smile. But I would like to make two of my own.
First, given the large private sector I would have expected entry by private equity firms such as in the US but this was not the case. The clue would be seem to in the fee levels chared (c.a. 2,500 pounds against 18,000 pounds for a three-year bachelors), even accounting for the much lower wages in Poland, I would find it hard to see how the large margins they typically seek would be acheiveable.
Second, the Polish I think have adapted as well as could be expected given their historical trajectory; but on their own terms. Some of the practices we have seen, compare well with good practices in the UK.
In fact after the Study Tour, I spent three more weeks backpacking round it (until I fell ill). I like the place and given the opportunity might be persuaded to stay there a while (Polish HEIs - hint, hint!).
There is a good story to be told about Polish HE and I hope we as a team will be able to do it justice.
Anyway, now to write the report. I hope to get it out of the door for November.
Sunday, 14 June 2015
Reflections: Angela Pater
The third of the series of reflections on the study tour is by Angela Pater, so over to you...
The Study Tour was a
fantastic opportunity to meet a wide range of people in Higher Education in
Poland. I was touched by their kindness and willingness to give substantial
amounts of their time to us to explain their systems, especially as many of
them were senior staff and exceptionally busy. I was surprised to note that
many staff held more than one role, often at more than one institution; this
was perhaps because of the PKA rules about minimum numbers of academic staff
required to run a programme, but perhaps also because of that famous ‘Polish
work ethic’ well known in the UK?
Students too, often seem to work full-time during the week and then
study at weekends for an undergraduate degree which they would complete within
three years. The private universities we visited (perhaps because they were the
more successful ones) were very professional and strategic in their approach,
being aware of the ‘demographic cliff’ which means the number of young Poles
entering the higher education market has dropped dramatically since 2006. The
key role of the ‘Founder’ in private universities was also unexpected; the provider
of the funding has substantial executive powers in appointing staff and running
the institution. State regulation of HE seems high, with a constitutional right
to free higher education, and legislation setting the percentage of student
representatives which must be included on decision-making bodies in
universities.
Everyone we met upheld the
magnificent Polish tradition of hospitality, with excellent provision of food
and drink at every opportunity; I particularly liked the Polish ‘cheesecake’ sernik, of which I think I ate my own
bodyweight over the week. We were welcomed at the main door of many university
buildings, without even having to step inside to ask for our contact, and were
escorted courteously onto our next destination, which even included walking us
to our hotel in Poznan at 11pm (rather out of the town centre) after a starlit
tour of the city’s beautiful main square and castle. Even strangers in the
street were helpful in giving us directions, despite my appalling Polish.
Wednesday, 3 June 2015
Reflections: Marie Holmes
The second of the series of reflections is from Marie Holmes, so over to you...
Being a participant in the recent AUA
study tour to Poland has proved to be a very beneficial and interesting
experience for me. Having the
opportunity to meet with a broad range of people from both private and public
universities has given me an understanding of Polish HE.
I anticipated that
there would be some similarities and expected there to be differences in
structure and quality assurance processes and this proved to be the case. I have also learnt from discussions with
fellow tour participants about operations within UK institutions.
The welcome from individuals from all the
institutions visited in Poland was brilliant; all were very generous with their
time and hospitality. Some points which left an impression; both private and
public university representatives talked of the challenges that lay ahead
particularly of demographics/declining student numbers and the strategies to
combat this situation.
External evaluation is undertaken at either programme or
institutional level by the PKA (Polish Accreditation Committee equivalent of
the QAA) who carry out approximately 1000 reviews per year. Polish Universities
don’t operate a system of external examiners as in the UK. Some institutions
reported that student engagement and participation on university’s committees was
very high others that it can be sometimes difficult to encourage students to
participate (sound familiar?) even though students in Poland are required by
law to be represented on committees and can have significant influence on
policy and decision making including financial decisions. And the fact that plagiarism
is seen as a criminal offence was a very interesting point of view.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)